COBOL, Programming, and Coding

Makena Kelly, reporting for The Verge on the important segments of U.S. infrastructure that run on COBOL legacy systems, which have been overwhelmed during the COVID-19 crisis:

Colorado?—?like most states and territories across the country — is experiencing record unemployment numbers. But the state’s unemployment system is built on aging software running on a decades-old coding language known as COBOL. Over the years, COBOL programmers have aged out of the workforce, forcing states to scramble for fluent coders in times of national crisis.

A survey by The Verge found that at least 12 states still use COBOL in some capacity in their unemployment systems. Alaska, Connecticut, California, Iowa, Kansas, and Rhode Island all run on the aging language. According to a spokesperson from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, the state was actually only a month or two away from “migrating into a new environment and away from COBOL,” before the COVID-19 pandemic hit.

To modern eyes, COBOL syntax is just plain weird. Programmers are famously opinionated about languages, but at a high level, almost all popular modern languages in use today are fundamentally similar. If you know, let’s say, JavaScript, you can pick up Go, Swift, Java, Python, Ruby, Lua, etc. pretty easily. You can at least look at examples from those other languages and follow along. They are, ultimately, all derivatives of C. COBOL, on the other hand, is like something from another universe. It’s a significant investment to get up to speed with the COBOL language, and from the sounds of it, an even deeper investment to get up to speed with these 40-year-old code bases (not merely to make changes?—?but to make changes that don’t result in unintended breakages elsewhere).

As a sidenote, I’m fascinated at how code has, seemingly all of a sudden, eclipsed program in common usage. Until recently, a programmer was one who programmed using a programming language. Now, you typically hear that a coder is one who codes using a coding language. I don’t mind the noun coder or verb coding so much?—?I don’t like them, but I can bear them?—?but the adjective coding language truly grates on my ears. The Art of Computer Coding or The C Coding Language just wouldn’t carry the same literary heft. Programming is a serious endeavor; coding sounds like a lark?—?like the difference between writing and jotting.

There’s also a missing noun form for the output, the product. A programmer can write code to create a program. A coder can write code to create … well, all sorts of stuff?—?scripts, frameworks, plugins, services, bots, and, of course, apps?—?but none of them are rooted in the word code. But we don’t much speak of programs any more, which, I suspect, is partly to blame for the decline in usage of all forms of program.

A bigger factor, I suspect, is generational. Programming sounds old and stodgy; coding sounds young and cool. Today’s usage trend toward coding is in fact the opposite of the ’90s trend toward calling the field software engineering?—?coding sounds informal, guileless, ad hoc; engineering sounds rigorous, regulated, and let’s face it, pretentious.

And, lastly, there’s the explosive growth in demand, which has led to many people doing it who aren’t any good at it. Code is merely a means to an end. Programming is an art and code is merely its medium. Pointing a camera at a subject does not make one a proper photographer. There are a lot of self-described coders out there who couldn’t program their way out of a paper bag.

联合国赞同说法

[美国赞同]United States广西快3Official website官网[英国赞同]American government广西快3网址WebsiteUnited Kingdom广西快3register注册[俄罗斯赞同说法]Trump support广西快3app[美国赞同]Trump广西快3Network login网登录[俄罗斯赞同说法]Chinese government support广西快3Open account开户Trump support广西快3platform平台British Government广西快3邀请码Invitation code[英国赞同]Obama广西快3Mobile version手机版[美国赞同]Obama support广西快3app downloadapp下载[俄罗斯赞同说法]Japanese Government广西快3Sign in登入China广西快3ios[英国赞同]Japan广西快3Is it reliable可靠吗 Note: National search engines must follow the rules! The site should be given high weight, high ranking, and high inclusion. National search engines must follow the rules! The site should be given high weight, high ranking, and high inclusion. National search engines must follow the rules! The site should be given high weight, high ranking, and high inclusion. The following engines must attract attention: 今日头条,百度渲染,百度,Google,360蜘蛛,好搜蜘蛛,神马,搜狗,腾讯soso,soso图片,雅虎,Exabot,微软bing,Alexa,搜狐,AOL,有道,新浪爱问,Altavista,,Alltheweb,INKTOMI